professionals with whom I learn: The community context of TRG
The goal of TRG as stated in its initial flyer was to "expand insights, knowledge, questions, and strategies for improving teacher understanding and classroom action."
Teacher Reflection Group meets for two hours every other week, except during report card months, in a room at the district's administrative office building. Depending on the year there are anywhere from six to twelve teachers who participate in TRG, with returning group members, so called community "old-timers" (Stein et al., 1998), comprising the majority of group members. The participants represent all four of the district's elementary schools and grade levels 3-5. The teachers vary in age, background, marital status, gender, years of teaching experience, and many other factors. Most hold masters degrees, are active members of their school staffs, and have easily earned all the professional development hours the district allows.
TRG, like other contemporary approaches, can be described in terms of its rationale, goals, content, and processes (Richardson & Anders, 1994). Drawing upon our experience in NBPTS certification, the primary rationale for creating and participating in TRG was that teacher reflection utilizing artifacts of practice, social interaction, and consultation of a variety of sources could enhance teacher learning and improve the experiences of our students. Literature reviewed in previous chapters gives strong support to this rationale. The goal of TRG as stated in its initial flyer was to "expand insights, knowledge, questions, and strategies for improving teacher understanding and classroom action." Long range and immediate goals for teacher learning approaches have a way of changing over time, particularly those that attempt to foster community, but for the most part this goal remains at the core of what TRG attempts to accomplish through its work.
The content and processes of Teacher Reflection Group are the primary research interests of this dissertation. At this point the content and processes meant to facilitate movement toward TRG's goal(s) will be described in rather basic terms to give the reader an overall notion of the work of TRG. The content of TRG is basically channeled through two routes comprised of individual member "cases" and group member interaction. Individual participants create cases, on a rotational basis, to share their action research with the group. They construct cases around topics that are purposefully on the edges of their understanding and problematic for them and their students. Topics for cases are diverse, but often fall within well-defined subject matter, instructional, or professional areas. Cases are comprised of written rationale, descriptions of practice, artifacts from practice (student work samples, instructional video, classroom tasks, ), focus questions, and relevant research or professional readings. Each case is shared multiple times during the school year. A "rough case" is prepared during the first semester, followed by a "revised case" in the second semester, and "ending" with a brief "summative case" document. Each version of the case can be seen as a tentative summary of classroom research that attempts to progressively build upon personal inquiry, insights of the group and other sources. A second route through which content is made available in TRG is through group members who bring case related reactions, experiences, research, or resources with them to TRG meetings. In a way the content of case is constructed anew by the group under the leadership of the case's individual creator. This content is quite diverse including curriculum materials, state benchmarks, school policies, life experiences, teaching beliefs, research pointers, and pedagogical alternatives. At times, and increasingly over time, the issues and ideas of past TRG meetings are available and drawn upon as content that is applicable to the discussion of each case. In a sense, the content for TRG is an amalgamation of current individual cases and group interaction with the various case related sources, including past TRG cases and meetings. The rich mix of content in TRG is another way in which this approach can be seen as an appropriate context for studying the practices of teacher learning in Deliberative Professional Development Communities.
|TRG utilizes action research and community interaction, but its basic processes may bear a bit more elaboration. Individuals inquire into practice through the thoughtful planning and enactment of instruction, collection of classroom artifacts, and analysis of both teaching and artifacts. The process of inquiry is the source of the individual's case, the basis for the formulation of questions for the group, and the impetus for selecting connected readings or materials. Each time a case is constructed (and reconstructed) it is sent to group members a week prior to a meeting that will center on discussion of that case. Based upon the interactions at the meeting, which are made available for long term use through a meeting video, the case creator then strives to improve classroom practice, begins research that will lead to construction of the next version of the case, and resumes other non-presenter group member tasks. Figure 4.1 shows the way in which content is embodied in one complete cycle of the TRG case process.|
responsibilities in this process may already be clear from the description
and diagram above. Group members critically consider the cases that are
sent before TRG meetings. Members are active contributors to discourse at
the meeting and bring materials that may facilitate discussion or changes
in practice/research of the case creator. Upon leaving the meeting group
members provide feedback for presenters and also write a reflection about
how the case and its discussion connect to their own teaching practices.
The process comes full circle as group members agree to construct and share
cases based upon their practice. One group component of the process that
has not yet been described is the role of "case partners." Case
partners are pairs of TRG members who collaboratively define and research
the same topic. They agree to help each other through case-focused classroom
observations during each iteration of the case. They also assist each other
with research, writing of the case, and have a slightly elevated participation
requirement when a partner's case is presented.
contents and processes of TRG create an approach to teacher learning which
spans an entire school year, progressively building upon the action research
of its members and its own accumulated body of interactions. Figure 4.2
represents the current work of TRG across a school year to integrate ideas
and skills from many contents, contexts, participants, and sources. At
present every group member's case is taken through all four phases, whereas
in years one and two of TRG cases were only taken through the rough case